Rust vs Python: A Comprehensive Comparison for Developers
table of contents
Deciding between Rust vs Python programming is a new challenge. This is especially true as we consider their growing popularity in the developer community. Python has been a versatile language with over 30 years of history, dominating various fields. On the other hand, Rust is a rapidly rising star, gaining popularity amongst businesses and developers alike. When to use Rust vs Python depends on your project requirements and goals.
Before choosing between Rust and Python, let’s first have a basic understanding of both of these.
What is Rust?
Designed as a multiparadigm programming language, Rust enables developers to create dependable and effective code. Originally developed by Mozilla Research in 2010, like C and C++ it emphasizes efficiency and safety. Fast, memory-efficient without garbage collecting, rust integrates well with other languages and embedded systems.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Rust:
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Quick performance | Notable curve of learning |
Safety of memory without garbage collecting | Not as developed an ecosystem as Python |
Safety in threads by default | Development is slower than in dynamic languages |
Low-level hardware control. | Low Level monkey patching support |
Zero-cost deviations |
Want to Develop Custom Mobile App?
Innvonix is a leading website development company having worked with many clients from different industries worldwide.
What is Python?
Designed for flexibility and speed, Python—introduced by Guido van Rossum in 1991—is a multiparadigm programming language It simplifies code readability and makes it beginner-friendly by removing difficult syntactic devices as semicolons and curly brackets. Python’s simplicity and adaptability fit many fields, including system management, application development, data analytics, AI and ML development company.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Python:
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Relatively smaller learning curve | Slower compared to C++ and Java |
Quick development with dynamic typing | Errors won’t be visible until runtime |
Massive collections of libraries and frameworks | Not thread safe by default |
Interpreted nature lets hot reloading possible |
Choosing Between Rust vs Python: Factors of Differences
Performance
Rust’s manual memory management and compile-time checks make it more efficient than Python when comparing Rust vs Python for performance. Python is slower as an interpreted language, even with CPython intended for speed. Rust may be more than twice as fast as Python and is quicker overall. Rust is compiled straight into machine code, therefore between the code and the hardware there is no virtual machine or interpreter. Without overheads, Rust performs generally like languages like C and C++.
Memory Management
When comparing Rust vs Python for memory management, Python’s garbage collection is outperformed by Rust’s ownership model. Rust guarantees ownership violations at compile time to effectively and safely manage memory. By spotting and releasing unwanted variables, Python uses a garbage collector to automate memory management. Python’s performance is therefore less under control than that of Rust’s manual memory management, which provides more scalability and control.
emory Management
When comparing Rust vs Python for memory management, Python’s garbage collection is outperformed by Rust’s ownership model. Rust guarantees ownership violations at compile time to effectively and safely manage memory. By spotting and releasing unwa
Security
Programming languages help users to handle code security. Python lets customize memory management and prevents memory leaks. Rust, on the other hand, was intended with security in mind; one may say of it as “safe-by-default.” Unless the developer chooses to modify it, this language is totally memory safe.
Safe Rust and Unsafe Rust are two code forms available from Rust. Safe Rust limits the programmer to guarantee that the code runs as expected. Unsafe Rust allows the developer greater freedom, but they now have more code safety responsibility.
Learning Curve
When we talk about learning curve Rust vs Python, the latter shines. Rust requires past coding skills to develop and has a more complicated grammar structure. Python is used in a more diverse range than Rust as it is simple to grasp. Python is ahead in terms of use as developers can use fewer lines of code.
Concurrency
When comparing Rust vs. Python for concurrency, Rust’s ownership and type-checking concepts allow safe, data race-free multithreaded programming, assuring efficiency and memory safety, while Python’s Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) might restrict concurrent execution, affecting performance.
Extensibility
Python has the best extensibility of any programming language. Python will continue to lead the pack when it comes to extensibility because to its vast ecosystem, which comprises a variety of libraries, frameworks, programmers, and services.
At the same time, Rust is still an ecosystem that is expanding due to its popularity. Even while the Rust community is constantly introducing new features, the language has a long way to go before it can be considered a Python alternative.
Community and Ecosystem
While deciding between Rust vs Python for web development, Python’s big community, robust ecosystem, and rich libraries meet a variety of demands. Despite being relatively new, Rust places a premium on security and efficiency; the package manager Cargo streamlines dependency management and spreads best practices.
hire mobile app developers
Utilization
Python is chosen over Rust vs Python for web development because to its versatility in statistics, data visualization, and popular services like Facebook and Netflix, all supported by a strong ecosystem. In contrast, Rust excels in safety- and efficiency-focused critical infrastructure projects, high-performance applications, and game creation. Amazon, Cloudflare, and Firefox are examples. The optimal language depends on project performance and scalability.
Rust | Python | |
Performance | Twice as faster and efficient in comparison to Python | Slower |
Memory Management | Manual memory management | Automatic memory management with garbage collection |
Security | High | Low |
Learning Curve | Significant learning curve | Gentler learning curve |
Concurrency | Safe, data race-free multithreaded programming | Restricts concurrent execution |
Extensibility | Still expanding | Best extensibility due to vast ecosystem |
Community and Ecosystem | Active and Emerging | Bigger Community |
Utilization | Used for high-performance apps | Used in multiple fields such as statistics, data visualization, and web development |
Popular Applications Built with Rust
Given the performance, extensibility, utilization, security, and many other ways in which Rust is better than Python, here are a few applications that has been rebuilt on Rust.
Dropbox
Rust code is used in part to build Dropbox’s file-syncing engine. The engine’s high concurrency makes it difficult to write, test, and debug. The thorough compile-time checks and static types of Rust make it superior to dynamically typed languages like Python when working with complicated applications and concurrent programming.
Meta, Facebook’s source control backend, was rebuilt in Rust from its original Python code. For their source control backend upgrade, Meta required a compiled language, and the security characteristics of Rust were a big draw. On that point, Rust was welcomed by the source control team.
Discord
Rust forms the basis of both the client and server portions of Discord’s software. For example, by employing Elixir Native Implemented Functions (NIFs), the team could grow to 11 million concurrent users. Apart from that, Discord has ported its Read States service from Go to Rust.
Popular Applications Built with Python
Given the advantages of Python, here are a few applications built with Python:
Python-built Instagram redefined digital photography with speedy, creative sharing. About 500 million people use it everyday. Despite historical scaling difficulties, its simplicity of use aligns with Instagram’s engineering philosophy of “Do the simple things first,” which emphasizes user-friendly and team-building development.
Pinterest, third after Facebook and Twitter, lets users save, collect, and share photos. Pinterest, one of the most popular applications, uses Python and Django to quickly process enormous volumes of content. In fact, this application has used Python since day one.
Spotify
Spotify is the biggest streaming service, earning almost €10 billion annually. The organization chose Python for its speed and superior data analytics. Spotify can control Radio and Discover depending on user’s musical interests.
Rust vs Python: Choose the Right One with Innvonix
When picking which programming language to employ, it’s important to understand how Rust vs Python programming vary from one another. If you have a question, “when should I use rust over python”, or vice versa, this post is a guidebook, understanding in which requirements does the Python or Rust win.
With our developers, Innvonix’s expertise with Rust and Python offers expert consultation to guide you in choosing the right language for your project. Our developers are well-versed in both Python and Rust, so you may choose the language that best suits your needs: speed and flexibility or scalability. By making use of the best features of each language, we can tailor our services to your project’s unique demands during our first discussions.
Let's Discuss Your Project
Reach out and we will be happy to provide free consultation on your Frontend Development requirement.